<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Cell phone-only homes surpass those with landlines</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.gizhq.com/2009/05/09/cell-phone-only-homes-surpass-those-with-landlines/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.gizhq.com/2009/05/09/cell-phone-only-homes-surpass-those-with-landlines/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 Jan 2010 14:40:40 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cliq</title>
		<link>http://www.gizhq.com/2009/05/09/cell-phone-only-homes-surpass-those-with-landlines/comment-page-1/#comment-968</link>
		<dc:creator>cliq</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Sep 2009 06:44:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizhq.com/?p=974#comment-968</guid>
		<description>thanks for the interesting read, appreciated.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>thanks for the interesting read, appreciated.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Unlocked Cell Phone</title>
		<link>http://www.gizhq.com/2009/05/09/cell-phone-only-homes-surpass-those-with-landlines/comment-page-1/#comment-1311</link>
		<dc:creator>Unlocked Cell Phone</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 19:04:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizhq.com/?p=974#comment-1311</guid>
		<description>It seems Cell phone more popular</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems Cell phone more popular</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick b.</title>
		<link>http://www.gizhq.com/2009/05/09/cell-phone-only-homes-surpass-those-with-landlines/comment-page-1/#comment-1310</link>
		<dc:creator>nick b.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 20:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizhq.com/?p=974#comment-1310</guid>
		<description>I think the landline is on its way out of U.S. households, for good. Wrote about that here, &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/ndvmp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/ndvmp&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the landline is on its way out of U.S. households, for good. Wrote about that here, <a href="http://bit.ly/ndvmp" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/ndvmp</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: nick b.</title>
		<link>http://www.gizhq.com/2009/05/09/cell-phone-only-homes-surpass-those-with-landlines/comment-page-1/#comment-102</link>
		<dc:creator>nick b.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 14:52:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizhq.com/?p=974#comment-102</guid>
		<description>I think the landline is on its way out of U.S. households, for good. Wrote about that here, &lt;a href=&quot;http://bit.ly/ndvmp&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://bit.ly/ndvmp&lt;/a&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the landline is on its way out of U.S. households, for good. Wrote about that here, <a href="http://bit.ly/ndvmp" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/ndvmp</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Farner</title>
		<link>http://www.gizhq.com/2009/05/09/cell-phone-only-homes-surpass-those-with-landlines/comment-page-1/#comment-1309</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Farner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 23:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizhq.com/?p=974#comment-1309</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m seeing that same trend, Patrick.  In my opinion, the landline is slowly but surely becoming obsolete.  The only real necessary use I can see for it is in a business environment.  Cell phones can provide emergency personnel with something that landlines can&#039;t - your location.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cell phones can also make emergency calls (to 911) even if you don&#039;t have a service contract with a provider.  So they&#039;re good things to keep around anyway, even if you have a landline.  Just in case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m seeing that same trend, Patrick.  In my opinion, the landline is slowly but surely becoming obsolete.  The only real necessary use I can see for it is in a business environment.  Cell phones can provide emergency personnel with something that landlines can&#39;t &#8211; your location.</p>
<p>Cell phones can also make emergency calls (to 911) even if you don&#39;t have a service contract with a provider.  So they&#39;re good things to keep around anyway, even if you have a landline.  Just in case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawn Farner</title>
		<link>http://www.gizhq.com/2009/05/09/cell-phone-only-homes-surpass-those-with-landlines/comment-page-1/#comment-101</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawn Farner</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 17:01:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizhq.com/?p=974#comment-101</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m seeing that same trend, Patrick.  In my opinion, the landline is slowly but surely becoming obsolete.  The only real necessary use I can see for it is in a business environment.  Cell phones can provide emergency personnel with something that landlines can&#039;t - your location.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Cell phones can also make emergency calls (to 911) even if you don&#039;t have a service contract with a provider.  So they&#039;re good things to keep around anyway, even if you have a landline.  Just in case.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#39;m seeing that same trend, Patrick.  In my opinion, the landline is slowly but surely becoming obsolete.  The only real necessary use I can see for it is in a business environment.  Cell phones can provide emergency personnel with something that landlines can&#39;t &#8211; your location.</p>
<p>Cell phones can also make emergency calls (to 911) even if you don&#39;t have a service contract with a provider.  So they&#39;re good things to keep around anyway, even if you have a landline.  Just in case.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PatrickC</title>
		<link>http://www.gizhq.com/2009/05/09/cell-phone-only-homes-surpass-those-with-landlines/comment-page-1/#comment-1308</link>
		<dc:creator>PatrickC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 10 May 2009 02:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizhq.com/?p=974#comment-1308</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a very real trend I see among my friends and family. Only two out of the 30+ people that I can think of right now have landlines. The rest, like myself, have only the cell. I used to be concerned about the reliability of my cell because the reception was really not that great even in my home. About a year and a half ago I changed to the NET10 prepaid service and my reception is now a lot better. During this time I made 2 emergency calls (for other people) and both times had no problem. So I decided to let go of the landline which was not being used anyway. The only calls I ever received on it were from telemarketers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#39;s a very real trend I see among my friends and family. Only two out of the 30+ people that I can think of right now have landlines. The rest, like myself, have only the cell. I used to be concerned about the reliability of my cell because the reception was really not that great even in my home. About a year and a half ago I changed to the NET10 prepaid service and my reception is now a lot better. During this time I made 2 emergency calls (for other people) and both times had no problem. So I decided to let go of the landline which was not being used anyway. The only calls I ever received on it were from telemarketers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aPexDesigns online &#124; Cell phone-only homes surpass those with landlines &#124; gizHQ</title>
		<link>http://www.gizhq.com/2009/05/09/cell-phone-only-homes-surpass-those-with-landlines/comment-page-1/#comment-99</link>
		<dc:creator>aPexDesigns online &#124; Cell phone-only homes surpass those with landlines &#124; gizHQ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 22:34:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizhq.com/?p=974#comment-99</guid>
		<description>[...] more from the example source: Cell phone-only homes outgo those with landlines &#124; gizHQ          Thank you for reading this post. You can now Leave A Comment (0) or Leave A [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more from the example source: Cell phone-only homes outgo those with landlines | gizHQ          Thank you for reading this post. You can now Leave A Comment (0) or Leave A [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cell phone-only homes surpass those with landlines &#124; gizHQ &#187; Mobile Phone Street</title>
		<link>http://www.gizhq.com/2009/05/09/cell-phone-only-homes-surpass-those-with-landlines/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Cell phone-only homes surpass those with landlines &#124; gizHQ &#187; Mobile Phone Street</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 21:26:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizhq.com/?p=974#comment-98</guid>
		<description>[...] Read the rest here: Cell phone-only homes surpass those with landlines &#124; gizHQ [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Read the rest here: Cell phone-only homes surpass those with landlines | gizHQ [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cell phone-only homes surpass those with landlines &#124; gizHQ &#171; Homes</title>
		<link>http://www.gizhq.com/2009/05/09/cell-phone-only-homes-surpass-those-with-landlines/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Cell phone-only homes surpass those with landlines &#124; gizHQ &#171; Homes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 21:20:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.gizhq.com/?p=974#comment-97</guid>
		<description>[...] O&#173;ri&#173;gi&#173;nally p&#173;o&#173;st&#173;ed here:  Cell ph&#173;one-only h&#173;om&#173;&#173;es su&#173;r&#173;pass th&#173;ose with&#173; landlines &#124;... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] O&#173;ri&#173;gi&#173;nally p&#173;o&#173;st&#173;ed here:  Cell ph&#173;one-only h&#173;om&#173;&#173;es su&#173;r&#173;pass th&#173;ose with&#173; landlines |&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
<!-- WP Super Cache is installed but broken. The path to wp-cache-phase1.php in wp-content/advanced-cache.php must be fixed! -->